We basic determined how gamma try affected by grating size, between 1 so you can ten° in the diameter

Efficiency

I mentioned neuronal capturing prices and you will LFP gamma strength and you will level volume when you look at the V1 of 5 anesthetized macaque monkeys, for floating sinusoidal gratings of different versions, contrasts, orientations and you will disguised with assorted amounts of looks.

Around the individual web sites, stabilized gamma electricity fell doubled when gratings was indeed disguised having 80% sounds, while the average height regularity managed to move on out of 42

We analyzed a common set of sites across conditions-those that were activated by the smallest grating. The average LFP spectra showed nearly a twofold increase in gamma power with larger gratings (Fig. 2A, left), with a more apparent bump in the gamma range. We quantified the change in gamma power (25–55 Hz) by normalizing to its maximum across stimulus sizes at each site, and then averaging across sites (n = 209 sites). This normalized gamma power increased monotonically from 0.67 ± 0.02 for the smallest grating to 0.93 ± 0.01 for the largest (p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test; Fig. 2A, middle, black). Similar effects were seen in each individual animal (faint black lines, indicating average effect in each animal). Over the same range of sizes, the gamma peak frequency at individual recording sites decreased from 50.5 ± 0.2 to 37.9 ± 0.1 Hz (p < 0.0001, t test; Fig. 2A, middle, red; data from each animal in faint red). Thus, gamma power and peak frequency were modulated in opposite ways by stimulus size: an increase in gamma power was associated with a decrease in peak frequency. The simultaneously recorded neuronal responses showed strong suppression for large gratings, with the normalized spike rate decreasing from 0.86 ± 0.02 to 0.41 ± 0.02 (p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test; Fig. 2A, right).

Gamma stamina, level frequency, and you can neuronal shooting speed for different stimuli modifications into the V1. An effective, continue reading this Left, Stamina spectra of LFP getting gratings of various models (letter = 209 websites). Dashed line suggests the new gamma energy having impulsive passion. Center, Peak regularity from the gamma assortment (thicker yellow line) and you may stabilized gamma electricity (thicker black range). The light contours indicate the common data from for each and every creature. Dashed line suggests this new gamma power for spontaneous passion. Best, Normalized neuronal answers (heavy black colored range). Light lines indicate an average investigation regarding for every single creature. B, Kept, Power spectra from LFP a variety of degrees of music-masking (n = 228 sites). Middle, Top regularity and you will stabilized gamma strength. Right, Stabilized neuronal capturing price. C, Kept, Stamina spectra from LFP for several stimuli contrasts (letter = 90 internet). Center, Level volume and you may normalized gamma strength. Best, Normalized neuronal responses. D, Leftover, Electricity spectra off LFP getting gratings of various orientations (letter = 209 sites). Middle, Level regularity and you will stabilized gamma strength. Proper, Normalized neuronal responses. All the mistake pubs indicate SEM.

We next measured gamma induced by large gratings (10°) masked with different levels of noise. Noise was generated by replacing different proportions of the gratings with random large pixels of the same mean luminance (see Materials and Methods). We used large gratings because these induced the most gamma power, for which the peak frequency was most clearly defined. Masking noise reduced gamma power (see also Jia et al., 2011), and caused the peak frequency of the average spectrum to shift lower (Fig. 2B, left; n = 228 sites). 2 ± 0.1 Hz to 30.1 ± 0.4 Hz (p < 0.0001, t test; Fig. 2B, middle). Thus, for masking noise, gamma power and peak frequency were positively correlated across stimulus conditions: a ma power was associated with a decrease in peak frequency. Despite prominent changes in gamma, population neuronal firing rates were not affected by noise masking (ANOVA: F = 1.18, p = 0.14; Fig. 2B, right). The normalized spike rate for the unperturbed gratings was indistinguishable from the 80% noise condition (0.79 ± 0.02 vs 0.78 ± 0.01; p = 0.04, Wilcoxon signed-rank test).