OK a some good points, and I will comment on each in turn a but first the most important difference

The essence of a stored program computer is that in addition to the aprocessora and amemorya you need a program that needs to be created a and I would suggest that the intelligence of the https://homeloansplus.org/payday-loans-az/ creator (i

I think after you study yourself enough we pretty well are computers, I think the ultimate computer would eventually end up being us. being able to develop a machine that can have conscious is a dream for many scientists but they say it will be possible one day. One way to gather more information and increase your intelligence is to try some brain training, good blog with a list of what’s new in brain training:

The essence of a stored program computer is that in addition to the aprocessora and amemorya you need a program that needs to be created a and I would suggest that the intelligence of the creator (i

If you consider an evolutionary approach devoid of aIntelligent Designa the stored program model must be considered totally inappropriate before you consider any other factors. The problem is that after the war computers took off at an enormous pace a with potential manufacturers falling over one another to try and capture the aclever programmable calculator marketa. No one a but no one – had time to stop and do any blue sky research to see if there were other ways of organising electronics to build a human-friendly information processor.

After 20-30 years of this mad rush to make money and build careers everyone knew that: A A A A A (1) You had to be very clever to program a computer A A A A A (2) There was a vast establishment of people whose careers and/or income depended on stored program computers and A A A A A (3) Computers were so wonderful the underlying theory MUST BE RIGHT. People started to look at the Human-Computer Interface a but this was not fundamental research a it was technology to find better ways of hiding the incomprehensible ablack boxa in the heart of a stored program computer. Over 40 years ago, as a anaive novicea in the computer industry I was looking at a major commercial system (say 250,000 customers, 5,000 product lines, 25,000 transactions a day a and a dynamically changing market.

Not knowing any better I mers and systems analysts were a liability a and that one could provide a sales staff friendly system which could dynamically change with changing requirements. Of course my boss threw the whole idea into the waste paper basket and I decided to change jobs. I ended up in the Future Large Computer marketing research department with a small but imaginative computer company. I concluded it was possible to build a awhite boxa information processor which could be be used by normal humans to help them work on dynamic open-ended tasks.

When I mentioned this to my boss, a aTOP SECRETa label was stuck on the idea, patents were taken out, and I was put in charge of a team which, two years later showed the basic idea was sound. So why haven’t you heard of it? Well at this point the company was taken over and as my idea was incompatible with the astored program computer a approach I was declared redundant. I found what turned out to be a most unfriendly hole to try and continue the research but after 20 years, a family suicide and a bullying head of department I gave up afighting the computer establishmenta from sheer exhaustion, Selling the idea became harder and harder as even school children were being brainwashed to believe that computers are the ultimate technology and you need to be clever to program them.